"Jcarr" (jcarr)
08/24/2017 at 17:08 • Filed to: None
1
26|
"Jcarr" (jcarr)
08/24/2017 at 17:08 • Filed to: None | 1
| 26 |
Share the average HP/Cubic Inch/Cylinder count etc. numbers for all the vehicles you’ve owned (or at least the ones you can remember).
Here’s mine:
Alfalfa
> Jcarr
08/24/2017 at 17:15 |
|
3.64l, 6.2 cyl, 193 hp
EL_ULY
> Jcarr
08/24/2017 at 17:16 |
|
awesome!
I want to super glue my 2 engines. 5.0 I-11 turbo making a little under 400hp.
Straight Eleven...... that sounds so rad.
|
Jcarr
> EL_ULY
08/24/2017 at 17:17 |
|
I bet it would sound awesome, too. 300ish cubes divided between that many cylinders. I bet it would rev.
Ssfancyfresh
> Jcarr
08/24/2017 at 17:26 |
|
I’ve got a 2.96l, 5 cylinder with 234 hp
|
Jcarr
> Ssfancyfresh
08/24/2017 at 17:26 |
|
Sounds peppy.
HammerheadFistpunch
> Jcarr
08/24/2017 at 17:33 |
|
These are the ones my wife and I have owned together and paid our own monies for. I’ve “owned” several other cars but they weren’t actually mine on paper.
I don’t drive buy big engined vehicles it turns out and 50% have been turbocharged.
WilliamsSW
> Jcarr
08/24/2017 at 17:34 |
|
Is it weird that I basically had this handy? The pre-’72 cars are based on a SWAG conversion from gross to net.
Bytemite
> Jcarr
08/24/2017 at 17:35 |
|
1993, 4.0 liter 8 cylinder - 254 hp
2013, 1.8 liter 4 cylinder - 148 hp
1990, 1.6 liter 4 cylinder - 116 hp
2016, 1.6 liter 4 cylinder - 201 hp
1985, 1.6 liter 4 cylinder - 112 hp
2001, 2.2 liter 4 cylinder - 200 hp
I really want a small displacement I6 one day...but I hate the fuel economy of anything over 4 cylinders and 1.6 liters.
2.1 Liter 4.66 cylinder - 172 hp
Mercedes Streeter
> Jcarr
08/24/2017 at 17:39 |
|
Alright, let’s do this! Total cars owned since I started driving: 4.
2001 Kia Rio - 1500cc - 96hp - 4cyl
2012 smart fortwo - 999cc - 70hp - 3cyl
2016 smart fortwo - 899cc - 89hp - 3cyl
2005 smart fortwo - 700cc - 61hp - 3cyl
Oh god I don’t even want to math that out. lol
|
Bytemite
> WilliamsSW
08/24/2017 at 17:40 |
|
Wow a 3.8 liter 6 cylinder making only 191 hp would be sad.
BahamaTodd
> Jcarr
08/24/2017 at 17:41 |
|
|
WilliamsSW
> Bytemite
08/24/2017 at 17:42 |
|
LOL yeah the number of big, old, inefficient engines is making the HP number look pathetic.
Highlander-Datsuns are Forever
> Jcarr
08/24/2017 at 17:45 |
|
Nothing
> Jcarr
08/24/2017 at 18:15 |
|
Oof, that’s too much work. I’m at 163 cyl, for an average of 6.037.
Nibbles
> Jcarr
08/24/2017 at 19:21 |
|
Here’s my data (had to ensmallen it to make it all fit)
|
Jcarr
> Nibbles
08/24/2017 at 19:32 |
|
‘96 Metro lyfe
G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3
> Jcarr
08/24/2017 at 19:44 |
|
In that case, I’ve got a 4.8L V8 with 190 HP.
pip bip - choose Corrour
> Jcarr
08/25/2017 at 05:41 |
|
car #1 3.3L / 202ci / 6cyl / 135hp / 194lb/ft (Holden)
car #2 3.3L / 202ci / 6cyl / 115hp / 171lb/ft (Holden)
car #3 1.6L / 98ci / 4cyl / 99hp / 100lb/ft (Holden)
car #4 2.0L / 122ci / 4cyl / 134hp / 139lb/ft (Holden)
car #5 2.0L / 122ci / 4cyl / 123hp / 128lb/ft (Mitsubishi)
total 12.2L / 746ci / 24cyl / 606hp / 732lb/ft
avg is 2.44L / 149.2ci / 4.8cyl / 121.2hp / 146.4lb/ft
BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires
> Jcarr
08/25/2017 at 06:26 |
|
Errr, how do you categorise project vehicles?
NojustNo
> Bytemite
08/25/2017 at 11:22 |
|
Don’t forget a lot of old motors made up for horsepower wwith torque.
For example my old coupe deville 7 liters 193hp but 320 torque. Miss that white whale!
(Not my car)
|
NojustNo
> Nibbles
08/25/2017 at 11:29 |
|
Damon nibby i thought I’d owned a lot of cars lol.
I’m 41 and have had probably about as many since I bought my first car at 18.. how old are you if I may ask?
How did you like your saab? Always wanted a 900 turbo 2 door .
|
Nibbles
> NojustNo
08/25/2017 at 11:52 |
|
I’m not Nibby lol
But I’m 34. I get bored easily
I loved the SPG so much I bought another to clone when it got totaled. The SPG was on my list of attainable dream cars. They’re quick, comfortable, economical (I saw 34.5 mpg being nice to it on the highway) and could swallow a full-size fridge in the rear
|
Bytemite
> NojustNo
08/25/2017 at 12:07 |
|
320 ft lbs out of 7 liters? Compared to the pathetic horsepower it’s making I guess it isn’t as pathetic. But 65-75 ft lbs is considered a mediocre amount of torque per liter. That thing is barely scraping 45 lol
|
NojustNo
> Bytemite
08/25/2017 at 12:26 |
|
Ok yah it still sucks but its a good example of the hp/torque ratio.
On practice my Seville had plenty of power. And I think got 15mpg. This was around 2003 when gas was like 1.80 a gallon.
|
NojustNo
> Nibbles
08/25/2017 at 12:32 |
|
Sorry about the name confusion. I answered before morning coffee.
Thanks for sharing! I may still get a saab they are dirt cheap now if you don’t mind putting in some work
|
Nibbles
> NojustNo
08/25/2017 at 13:22 |
|
Do it. A few things to watch for:
Don’t get an 89-90. ECM problems abound
Rust on axle portals are a death sentence
That’s about it. The engine is a million-mile unit (mine went 348k before blowing the original head gasket) and most c900 components are well overbuilt.